🔗 Share this article

The true crime category has an innovative format, or perhaps even a whole new language and grammar: police body cam footage. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and potential offenders appear suddenly to the cameras, at times in the intense brightness of vehicle beams or torches as the police arrive, their faces and voices eloquent of wariness or panic or anger or dubiously feigned naivety. And we often catch sight of the expressions of the law enforcement personnel, one waiting impassively while the other conducts the inquiry with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though maybe this is because they are aware they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have previously seen the Netflix real-life crime film American Murder: Gabby Petito, about the killing of an Instagram influencer by her boyfriend, whose main point of interest was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the police seemed surprisingly lenient with the suspect. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, made exclusively of officer footage. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the tragic incident of Ajike Owens in a city in Florida, a African American woman whose four young kids reportedly bothered and tormented her white neighbour, a local resident. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighborhood conflicts in which the police were repeatedly called, Lorincz shot Owens dead through her closed front door, when Owens went to the neighbor's residence to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Investigation and State Laws

The investigating authorities found proof that Lorincz had done online research into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow residents and others to use firearms if there is a reasonable belief of threat. The movie builds its story with the officer recordings captured during the multiple officer calls to the location before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered crime scene itself – introduced by 911 audio material of Lorincz calling the police in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also jail video of the individual which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Portrayal of the Accused

The film does not really suggest anything too complex about the neighbor, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the children are heard calling her “the Karen”, an hurtful taunt. The production is presented as an illustration of how “stand your ground” laws lead to senseless and tragic violence. But the reality of firearm possession and the constitutional right (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a deceased pundit famously claimed made gun deaths a necessary cost) is not much highlighted.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel astonished at how little interest the police took in this point. When did she buy her gun? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Was it just on the couch, loaded and ready? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they may have done in footage that were not included). Or is gun ownership so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or bread heaters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what appeared to her local residents a very long time, the suspect was not even arrested and charged, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another point of comparison, incidentally, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an remarkable scene in which Lorincz simply refuses to stand, refuses to put her wrists out for the cuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she is unable to comply. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is saved for the closing credits. A deeply sobering picture of American crime and punishment.